Community-powered habitat monitoring that tells councils whether biodiversity net gain is real — not just paperwork.
A traffic light for every BNG site. Green, amber, or red — backed by evidence.
One dashboard. All BNG sites. Community volunteers with smartphones document habitat condition — species counts, photos, drawn extents. Satellite fills the gaps between visits. OS data provides the spatial framework. The council gets evidence they can't produce themselves.
Existing tools manage paperwork or require expensive professionals. None verify whether habitats are actually thriving.
| BNG Monitor | Verna | Linckia | BNGAI | Consultancy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Satellite monitoring | ✓ | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Citizen science data Only us | ✓ | — | — | — | — |
| AI condition scoring | ✓ | — | — | ~ | — |
| OS data integration | ✓ | ~ | ~ | — | ~ |
| Works without ecologist | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ | — |
| Ground-truth verification | ✓ | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Annual cost per council | £3K | £10K | £1.2K+/user | — | £300–800/day |
Founder-problem fit: Reuben has physically installed the green infrastructure that gets forgotten. Manon has written the council strategies that can't be monitored. They built BNG Monitor because they've lived both sides of the gap.